I want to enable write-access in a Mac OS X installation for an NTFS partition in an external hard disk. I don't want to switch to FAT32 for performance reasons. An exFAT partition sounds good, but it's not compatible with older versions of Mac OS X. I'm also not sure of its performance as compared to NTFS.
I've searched all over for what is a good solution. But the more I read, the more confused I get. Free. Native hack to enable write access (unsupported, reviewed as unstable). NTFS-3G (slow speed, looks abandoned). Seagate NTFS driver for Mac (probably works for Seagate drives only, not helpful in my case) Paid.
Paragon NTFS (better speeds, but some bad reviews). Tuxera NTFS (seems generally more favored) I came across others here and there but they are rarely talked about. I have a WD hard disk (1TB) that I plan to make two unequal partitions in.
So over time I know that my Vista partition, with all the programs I am using should be about 65 GBs. I needed to make it bigger few times until reached this size. I want to Install Vista for games (65GB), Ubuntu for work (15 GB, tentative size), and OS X (maybe 20 GBs?) just to play with it and see what all the buzz is about. 4th partition will be for data that all of the OSes should have access to. A Mac with OS X 10.5.x through OS X 10.10.x (Yosemite). This guide is specific to OS X 10.5, but it should be usable with earlier versions of the Mac OS. There may be minor nomenclature changes between the versions of Disk Utility included with the various versions of the Mac OS, but overall, the steps should be pretty similar.
One large partition (99-99.9%) for HFS+ (mainly used with Mac OS X), and a small partition (0.1-1%) for Windows compatibility. The large HFS+ partition will be for the main data storage and Time Machine backups.
The smaller partition will be for quick data transfer from Mac to Windows or vice versa but not for permanent data storage. A portable HFS+ reader software like HFSExplorer will be in the Windows-readable partition to help read the HFS+ partition on a Windows computer. I would like your recommendations mostly focused on the smaller Windows-compatible partition. Questions.
What is the easiest solution to enable write access to NTFS? (easy means one-click install, or just a couple of scriptable commands - assume novice user). What is the most stable and/or most outperforming solution to do the same?
(not necessarily the easiest). What solution just works? (no hassles, drive always shows up on Mac desktop - not necessarily same as above, but preferred). Is purchasing Tuxera or Paragon worth it? If yes, which one is better?. Should I just switch to exFAT and just forget that I even thought about NTFS?
This would mean the drive would be writable to all modern Windows and Mac (no need to consider Linux) without needing any software - but would be dead to anything old. Should I switch to FAT32 since it's just a tiny partition that is not used for much? This should not affect the performance of the drive or the other HFS+ partition. While you're at it, what about the partition table? MBR or GPT, or something else?. Finally, any other software recommended for reading (or even writing) HFS+ partition in Windows?
I dislike that HFSExplorer requires Java, which cannot be guaranteed to be available or up-to-date. I use Paragon NTFS and love it. And on the Windows side I purchased. Both of them worked right out of the box installations. They work very well, though I have not tried Tuxera. It is best to keep HFS+ on the Mac portion and NTFS on the Windows side.
Their 'native tongues' so to speak. They work best on their own turf. GPT can handle larger sized drives. It is up to you on that one. Either MBR or GPT will be fine from the getgo. FAT32 gets rid of any security and really like you said is only for small drives. The bonus of course is that it is compatible with everything.
I have used exFAT & EXT3FS on external drives but every now and then one gets corrupted and one or the other OS has issues reading it afterwards. Usually the Mac side. Windows tends to be able to read it anyway.
My setup: I have a MacBook Pro dual booting via BootCamp and running rEFIt (haven't bothered to update to rEFInd or other options because it works great with Win8.1 and OS X Mavericks). I think I will go with a small FAT32 partition for the occasional transfer to and from Windows, but have the other partition as HFS+. I don't require an NTFS partition as the disk is mainly going to be used with Mac (say 99% of the time) and that would be a waste of space.
Anyway, thank you for the input. I'm only concerned about MBR/GPT issue as I read that Time Machine backups are more likely to fail with MBR but as XP 64-bit and everything after that supports GPT, it shouldn't be a huge issue as we're already moving away from XP. And I'm off to figure out limiting Time Machine disk usage. – Sep 12 '14 at 3:26.